The
second draft relied heavily on boxes to mimic the look of the original
draft. Please see the screen capture below, or, for a better visual, click here to access the second draft.
Because it was crafted on iWeb with little
attention to how the final product would work when transferred to other
machines and unfamiliar browsers, the first draft was not compatible with the machines
colleagues used to
read the piece. This led to my second draft, where I attempted to
re-teach myself to use HTML nine years after I had last designed a website.
As you can see to the below, recreating the original look of the
piece wasn't the best idea I've ever had. Just as my
students learn that casual language does not belong in their case study
of writing in a particular community, I learned that the newsletter
look, separated by boxes, did not work well. On the other hand, boxes
could work effectively as tabs and as organizational tools
for showcasing pieces of earlier drafts.
On
the other hand, using boxes or "modules" is something encouraged in web
design. Readers dislike feeling as though text or images are floating
in
a void; using boxes harnesses information and does help readers focus
their attention. The current version also contains text and multimodal
elements in modules, to anchor reading and give viewers a sense of
cohesion.
You'll also notice that the content shifted from the first draft to the
second. I broke the piece apart more, dividing sections and erasing
the least necessary inforamtion (as I would for any text).
|