Home
Defining Multimodal Composition Affordances
Constraints
Drafts
Reflections References

Draft 2: Ineffectual Mimicry


The second draft relied heavily on boxes to mimic the look of the original draft.  Please see the screen capture below, or, for a better visual, click here to access the second draft.

Because it was crafted on iWeb with little attention to how the final product would work when transferred to other machines and unfamiliar browsers, the first draft was not compatible with the machines colleagues used to read the piece. This led to my second draft, where I attempted to re-teach myself to use HTML nine years after I had last designed a website.

As you can see to the below, recreating the original look of the piece wasn't the best idea I've ever had. Just as my students learn that casual language does not belong in their case study of writing in a particular community, I learned that the newsletter look, separated by boxes, did not work well. On the other hand, boxes could work effectively as tabs and as organizational tools for showcasing pieces of earlier drafts.

On the other hand, using boxes or "modules" is something encouraged in web design. Readers dislike feeling as though text or images are floating in a void; using boxes harnesses information and does help readers focus their attention. The current version also contains text and multimodal elements in modules, to anchor reading and give viewers a sense of cohesion.

You'll also notice that the content shifted from the first draft to the second. I broke the piece apart more, dividing sections and erasing the least necessary inforamtion (as I would for any text).
Divided Draft


This latter, second draft further demonstrates portfolios' and multimodal compositions' shared attributes. As I moved from one technique to the second, I could better understand what was happening in my argument as well as how the visuals really worked (not well). This second draft forced me to look more closely at the visual rhetoric I was attempting to adopt. Adapting the template was not an effective argumentative move. Rather, it made my argument appear disjointed, sporadic, and unwieldy. When I was able to condense and revise my visual rhetoric along with my textual rhetoric, I strengthened the project overall. Here, the elements of reflection and progress evident in portfolio pedagogy parallel the critical approach to visual rhetoric writers must attend to while crafting multimodal compositions.

Top
Home
Defining Multimodal Composition Affordances
Constraints
Drafts
Reflections References