Guiding Questions |
Portfolio
Contents Home The Background Portfolios, Technologies, and the Composition Classroom EPortfolios Why Portfolios? Outlining Multimodal Composition The Cs Enhanced Writing Parallel Educational Tools First Parallel Second Parallel Third Parallel Fourth Parallel New Directions: Into Infinity (Expanding Ideas) Tangent Line 1 Tangent Line 2 Tangent Line 3 Final Reflections References |
Hawisher and Selfe (1997) briefly discuss connecting features of
portfolio assessment and use of computers in the composition classroom.
With this early work, they find parallel discussions of portfolio and
technology usage throughout the discipline.
They caution instructors
and researchers to be critical of how they discuss using
portfolios and contemporary writing technologies—implying that
instructors and researchers need more precise language to talk about
these classroom tools.
A
critical, cautionary approach to understanding
portfolio and technology usage is crucial to moving praxis forward, but
talking about portfolios and multimodal writing with parallel
terms and tones is not enough to explain the connections and
limitations of
using portfolios and computers together in the first-year composition
classroom or any other composition classroom.
|
|
I articulate the parallels, consistencies, and inconsistencies
associated with using portfolio assessment approaches in
technology-accessible classrooms. I use these articulationg throughout the webtext as a means to answer the
following questions about portfolios and contemporary composition
classrooms through a critical lens:
|