References

Portfolio Contents The Background Guiding Questions Portfolios, Technologies, and the Composition Classroom EPortfolios Why Portfolios? Outlining Multimodal Composition The Cs Enhanced Writing   Parallel Educational Tools First Parallel Second Parallel Third Parallel Fourth Parallel New Directions: Into Infinity (Expanding Ideas) Tangent Line 1 Tangent Line 2 Tangent Line 3 Final Reflections

Alberti, J. (2008). The game of reading and writing: How video games reframe of understanding of literacy. Computers and           composition, 25(3), pp. 258-269. Anson, C. M. (2003). Responding to and assessing student writing: The uses and limits of technology. In P. Takayoshi & B.            Huot (Eds.), Teaching writing with computers: An introduction (pp. 234-246). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Blair, K. L. & P. Takayoshi. (1997). Reflections on reading and evaluating electronic portfolios. In K. B Yancey & I. Weier           (Eds.), Situating portfolios: Four perspectives (pp.  357-369). Logan: Utah State University Press. Callahan, S. (1997). Kentucky’s state-mandated writing portfolios and teacher accountability. In K. B. Yancey & I. Weiser           (Eds.). Situating portfolios: Four perspectives (pp. 57-71). CCCC. (2004). Position statement on teaching, learning, and assessing writing in digital environments. Retrieved on           April 20, 2009, from http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/digitalenvironments. Cronbach, L. (1988). Five perspectives on validation argument. In H. Wainer & H.I. Braun (Eds). Test validity (pp3-17).             Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press. Faigley, L. (1989). Judging writing, judging selves.  College composition and communication, 40, pp. 395-414. Gold, S. E. (1992). Increasing student autonomy through portfolios. In K. B. Yancey (Ed.), Portfolios in the writing classroom:           An introduction (pp. 20-30). Urbana: NCTE. Gruber, S. (2003). The language of web texts: Teaching rhetorical analysis of web material through scaffolding. In P. Takayoshi           & B. Huot (Eds.), Teaching writing with computers: An introduction (pp. 153-165). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Handa, C. (2003). Teaching with the world wide web: Transforming theory, pedagogy, and practice. In P. Takayoshi & B. Huot           (Eds.), Teaching writing with computers: An introduction (pp. 166-181). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Hawisher, G.E. & C. L. Selfe (1997). Wedding the technologies of writing portfolios and computers: The challenges of           electronic classrooms. In K. B. Yancey & I. Wesier (Eds.), Situating portfolios: Four perspectives (pp. 305-321). Logan:           Utah State University Press. Kress, G. (2003). Literacies in the new media age. London: Routledge. Kynard, C. (2006). ’Y’all are killin me up in here’: Response theory from a newjack composition instructor/sistahgurl meeting           her students on the page. Teaching English in the two-year college, 34, pp. 361-387. Larson, R. L. (1996). Portfolios in the assessment of writing: A political perspective. In E. M. White, W. D. Lutz & S.           Kamusikiri (Eds.), Assessment of writing: Politics, policies, practices (pp. 271-283). New York: The Modern Language           Association of America. Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Lenard, M. (2005). Dealing with online selves: Ethos issues in computer-assisted teaching and learning. Pedagogy: Critical           approaches to teaching literature, language, composition, and culture, 5(1), pp. 77-95. Lundin, R. W. (2008). Teaching with wikis: Toward a networked pedagogy. Computers and composition, 25, pp. 432-448. Messick. S. (1989). Validity. Educational Measurement, Third Edition, ed. R.Linn. Washington, D.C.: American Council on           Education and National Council on Measurement in Education. Murphy, S. (1999). Assessing portfolios. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.). Evaluating writing: The role of teachers’           knowledge about texts, learning, and culture (pp. 114-135). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English. Murphy, S. & M. A. Smith (1999). Creating a climate for portfolios. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.).           Evaluating writing: The role of teachers’ knowledge about texts, learning, and culture (pp. 325-343). Urbana: National           Council of Teachers of English. Murray, D. (November 1972). Teach writing as a process not product. The Leaflet, pp. 11-14. O’Brien, C. W. (1997). Of large-mouth milk jugs, cosmic trash compactors, and renewal machines: Reflections on a multi-task           portfolio assessment. In K. B. Yancey & I. Weiser (Eds.), Situating portfolios: Four perspectives (pp. 101-124). Logan:           Utah State University Press. Pagnucci, G. S. & N. Mauriello. (2008). Re-mapping narrative: Technology’s impact on the way we write. Cresskill: Hampton. Perry, M. (1997). Producing purposeful portfolios. In K. B Yancey & I. Weiser (Eds.), Situating           portfolios: Four perspectives (pp. 182-189). Logan: Utah State University Press. Phelps, L. W. (1989).  Images of student writing: The deep structure of teacher response. In C. M. Anson (Ed.). Writing and           response: Theory, practice and research (pp. 37-67). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English. Rice, J. E. (2008). Rhetoric's mechanics: Retooling the equipment of writing production. College composition and           communication, 60(2), pp. 366-387. Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Selfe, C. L. (Ed.). (2007). Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers. Cresskill: Hampton Press. Takayoshi, P. & C. L. Selfe. (2007). Chapter 1: Thinking about multimodality. In C. L. Selfe (Ed.), Multimodal composition           resources for teachers (pp. 1-12). Cresskill: Hampton Press, Inc. Tobin, L. (2001). Process pedagogy. In G. Tate, A. Rupiper & K. Schick (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (pp. 1-18).           New York: Oxford University Press. Vie, Stephanie. (2008). Digital divide 2.0: "Generation M" and online social networking sites in the composition classroom.           Computers and composition, 25(1), pp. 9-23. Wickliff, G. A. (1997). A hypertext authoring course, portfolio assessment, and diversity. In K. B Yancey & I. Weiser (Eds.),            Situating portfolios: Four perspectives (pp. 322-337). Logan: Utah State University Press.    WIDE Research Center. (2009). Retrieved on April 27, 2009, from http://www.wide.msu.edu/. Williams, B. (2007). Foreward. In C. L. Selfe (Ed.), Multimodal composition resources for teachers (pp. ix-xiii). Cresskill:            Hampton Press, Inc. Williams, B. (2008). “What South Park character are you?”: Popular culture, literacy, and online performances of identity.            Computers and composition, 25, pp. 24-39. Wysocki, A. F. (2001). Impossibly distinct: On form/content and word/image in two pieces of computer-based interactive            multimedia. Computers and composition, 18, pp. 209-234.and culture, 5(1), pp. 77-95. Wysocki, A. F., J. Johnson-Eilola, C. L. Selfe (Eds.). (2004). Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the            teaching of composition. Logan: Utah State University Press. Yancey, K. B. (1992). Portfolios in the writing classroom: A final reflection. In K. B. Yancey (Ed.), Portfolios in the writing            classroom: An introduction (pp. 102-116). Urbana: NCTE. Yancey, K. B. (2004). Made not online in words: Composition in a new key. College composition and communication, 56(2),            pp. 297-328. Zebroski, J. T. (1989). A hero in the classroom. In B. Lawson, S. S. Ryan, W. R. Winterowd (Eds.), Encountering student texts:            Interpretive issues in reading student writing (pp. 35-47). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.