|
Index | Editorial Staff | Submissions | Resources | Archives |
Grading the writing program
web site: Assessing some assessments |
||||||||||||||
» | This essay serves as a companion piece to “Reimagining Writing Program Websites as Pedagogical Tools,” which appears in the current edition of Computers and Composition (March 2004). In that article, I describe the Rutgers Writing Program's reconception of its website based on a student-centered, content-driven, collaboratively-constructed model, but I was only able to touch on the question of assessing the impact of such a website. This New Media composition is an attempt to address that issue more fully. Specifically, in this piece I examine several different methods of gauging a writing program's impact and success, arguing that ultimately none of these methods is a sufficient assessment in itself; rather, a multimodal approach provides the best answer while addressing multiple audiences. |
» enter |
||||||||||||
» | This composition was created with Macromedia's Flash software; the latest version of the Flash player is available for download. |
|||||||||||||
» | Although the content of this essay is in HTML, the main interface is a Flash movie sized 800x500. If your screen resolution is 800x600 or below, you may wish to use the alternate version to enter. | |||||||||||||
» | The movie is approximately 339 KB and should load fairly quickly; however, users with 28.8 or 56K connections may wish to jump straight to the main menu. | |||||||||||||
» Barclay Barrios, Rutgers University |