Conclusion

Overall, Rhetoric as a Posthuman Practice is quite open to letting the audience explore each idea that Boyle introduces in the book in the hopes of displaying the importance of accepting posthuman practice into current rhetorical practices. Boyle’s style of writing may cause certain readers to shy away from the book, as he is quite enthusiastic and tends to lean a bit on the side of greatly detailed writing over conciseness. However, Boyle’s work is definitely worth looking into, particularly if audience members have background information on posthumanism. Even those who are humanists could learn a lot from this book, as Boyle expands upon humanist practice and shows how posthumanist practice can fill in the gaps that humanism currently has in the new digital age.