Ahmed, Sarah. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Almjeld, Jen, & Blair, Kristine L. (2012). Multimodal methods for multimodal literacies: Establishing a technofeminist research identity. In Kristin L. Arola & Anne Frances Wysocki (Eds.), Composing (media) = Composing (embodiment) (pp. 97–109). Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press.

Bailey, Moya. (2014, April 27). More on the origin of misogynoir [Blog post]. Retrieved from

Banks, Adam J. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Beck, Estee N. (2015). The invisible digital identity: Assemblages in digital networks. Computers and Composition, 35, 125–140.

Beck, Estee N. (2017). Sustaining critical literacies in an age of digital algorithmic surveillance. In Douglas Walls & Stephanie Vie (Eds.), Social writing/social media: Publics, presentations, pedagogies (pp. 37–52). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse/Colorado State University Press.

Beck, Estee; Crow, Angela; McKee, Heidi A.; Reilly, Colleen A.; Vie, Stephanie; Gonzales, Laura; & DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole. (2016). Writing in an age of surveillance, privacy, and net neutrality. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 20(2). Retrieved from

Berger, Michelle Tracy, & Guidroz, Kathleen. (2009). Introduction. In Michelle Tracy Berger & Kathleen Guidroz (Eds.), The intersectional approach: Transforming the academy through race, class, and gender (pp. 1–22). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

Blair, Kristine L. (2012). A complicated geometry: Triangulating feminism, activism, and technological literacy. In Lee Nickoson, Mary P. Sheridan, & Gesa E. Kirsch (Eds.), Writing studies research in practice: Methods and methodologies (pp. 63–72). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Blay, Zeba. (2016). Alton Sterling, Philando Castile, and the indignity if Black death. Huffington Post. Retrieved from

Brady Aschauer, Ann. (1999). Tinkering with technological skill: An examination of the gendered uses of technologies. Computers and Composition, 16 (1), 7–23.

Brown, James J., Jr. (2015). Ethical programs: Hospitality and the rhetorics of software. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Citron, Danielle Keats. (2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cole, Kristi K. (2015). “It's like she's eager to be verbally abused”: Twitter, trolls, and (en)gendering disciplinary rhetoric. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 356–358.

Community Standards and Facebook Live. (2016, July 8). Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved from

Cook, Gary, & Van Horn, Jodie. (2009). How dirty is your data? Greenpeace. Retrieved from

Crenshaw, Kimberlé. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, 139–167.

Davies, Madeleine. (2015, September 25). Amelia Bonow explains how #ShoutYourAbortion ’just kicked the patriarchy in the dick.’ Jezebel. Retrieved from

De Hertogh, Lori. (2015). Reinscribing a new normal: Pregnancy, disability, and health 2.0. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, & Technology, 7. Retrieved from

DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole; Cushman, Ellen, & Grabill, Jeffrey T. (2005). Infrastructure and composing: The when of new-media writing. College Composition and Communication, 57(1), 14–44.

DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole, & Porter, James E. (2006). Why Naptster matters to writing: Filesharing as a new ethic of digital delivery. Computers and Composition, 23(2), 178–210.

Duffy, Brooke Erin. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Duggan, M. (2014, October 22). Online harassment. Pew Research Center: Internet and Technology. Retrieved from

Duggan, Maeve. (2017, July 11). Online harassment 2017. Pew Research Center: Internet and Technology. Retrieved from:

Dush, Lisa. (2015). When writing becomes content. College Composition and Communication, 67(2), 173–196.

Edwards, Dustin W. (2018). Circulation gatekeepers: Unbundling the platform politics of YouTube’s Content ID. Computers and Composition, 47, 61–74.

Edwards, Dustin W., & Gelms, Bridget. (2018). The rhetorics of platforms: Definitions, approaches, futures. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, 3(6). Retrieved from

Eubanks, Virginia. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Eyman, Douglas. (2015). Digital rhetoric: Theory, method, practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Faris, Michael. (2018). How to be gay with locative media: The rhetorical work of Grindr as a platform. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, 3(6). Retrieved from

Frost, Erin, & Haas, Angela. (2017). Seeing and knowing the womb: A technofeminist reframing of fetal ultrasound toward a decolonization of our bodies. Computers and Composition, 43, 88–105.

Gillespie, Tarleton. (2010). The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364.

Gruwell, Leigh. (2015). Wikipedia's politics of exclusion: Gender, epistemology, and feminist rhetorical (in)action. Computers and Composition, 37, 117–131.

Gruwell, Leigh. (2017). Writing against harassment: Public writing pedagogy and online hate. Composition Forum, 36. Retrieved from

Gruwell, Leigh. (2018). Constructing research, constructing the platform: Algorithms and the rhetoricity of social media research. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, 3(6), n.p.

Haas, Angela. (2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 277–310.

Haas, Angela; Tulley, Christine; & Blair, Kristine. (2002). Mentors versus masters: Women’s and girls’ narratives of (re) negotiation in web-based writing spaces. Computers and Composition, 19, 231–249.

Helmond, Anne. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2). Retrieved from

Hemmings, Clare. (2011). Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Herbst, Claudia. (2009). Masters of the house: Literacy and the claiming of space on the internet. In Kristine Blair, Radhika Gajjala, & Christine Tulley (Eds.), Webbing cyberfeminist practice: Communities, pedagogies and social action (pp. 135–152). New York: Hampton Press.

Hidalgo, Alexandra, & Grimes, Katie. (2017). A feminist approach to social media. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 21(2). Retrieved from

Hogan, Mél. (2015). Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center. Big Data & Society, 2(2). Retrieved from

hooks, bell. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

Janangelo, Joseph. (1991). Technopower and technoppression: Some abuses of power and control in computer-assisted writing environments. Computers and Composition, 9, 47–64.

Jane, Emma Alice. (2014a). “Back to the kitchen, cunt”: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 28, 558–570.

Jane, Emma Alice. (2014b). “Your a ugly, whorish, Slut”: Understanding e-bile. Feminist Media Studies, 14, 531–546.

Larson, Selena. (1 December 2017). Twitter has a new reason for why it didn't delete Trump's anti-Muslim retweets. CNNTech. Retrieved from

Leach, Samantha. (2017, December 6). #MeToo founder Tarana Burke on what needs to happen after the hashtag. Glamour. Retrieved from

Lecher, Colin. (2017, December 14). Read the dissenting statements of the Democratic FCC commissioners slamming net neutrality repeal. The Verge. Retrieved from

Lenhart, Amanda; Ybarra, Michele; Zickuhr, Kathryn; & Price-Feeney, Myeshia. (2016). Online harassment, digital abuse, and cyberstalking in America. Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved from

Mantilla, Karla. (2015). Gendertrolling: How misogyny went viral. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

Matias, J. Nathan; Johnson, Amy; Boesel, Whitney Erin; Keegan, Brian; Friedman, Jaclyn; & DeTar, Charlie. (2015, May 13). Reporting, reviewing, and responding to harassment on Twitter. Women, Action, and the Media. Retrieved from

McKee, Heidi. (2011). Policy matters now and in the future: Net neutrality, corporate data mining, and government surveillance. Computers and Composition, 28, 276–291.

Micciche, Laura. (2014). Writing material. College English, 76(6), 488–505.

Milano, A. [Alyssa_Milano]. (2017, October 15). If you’ve been sexually harassed or assaulted write “me too” as a reply to this tweet [Tweet]. Retrieved from

Milano, A. [Alyssa_Milano]. (2017, October 16). I was just made aware of an earlier #MeToo movement, and the origin story is equal parts heartbreaking and inspiring [Tweet]. Retrieved from

Montfort, Nick, & Bogost, Ian. (2009). Racing the beam: The Atari video computer system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nakamura, Lisa. (2014). Indigenous circuits: Navajo women and the racialization of early electronic manufacture. American Quarterly, 66(4), 919–941.

Nakamura, Lisa. (2015). Afterword: Blaming, shaming, and the feminization of social media. In Rachel Dubrofsky & Shoshana Amielle Magnet (Eds.), Feminist surveillance studies (pp. 221–228). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Noble, Safiya Umoja. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.

Noble, Safiya Umoja, & Tynes, Brendesha M. (2016). Introduction. In Safiya Umoja Noble & Brendesha M. Tynes (Eds.), The intersectional internet: Race, sex, class, and culture online (pp. 1–18). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

“Our approach to policy…” (2017). Twitter. Retrieved from

Parikka, Jussi. (2015). A geology of media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Park, Andrea. (24 October 2017). #MeToo reaches 85 countries with 1.7 million tweets. CBS News. Retrieved from

Poland, Bailey. (2016). Haters: Harassment, abuse, and violence online. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Porter, James E. (2009). Recovering delivery for digital rhetoric.Computers and Composition, 25, 207–224.

Powell, Malea. (2012). Stories take place: A performance in one act. College Composition and Communication, 64, 383–406.

Puwar, Nirmal. (2004). Space invaders: Race, gender and bodies out of place. New YorkY: Berg Publishers.

Reilly, Colleen A. (2004). Sexualities and technologies: How vibrators help to explain computers.Computers and Composition, 21, 363–385.

Reyman, Jessica. (2013). User data on the social web: Authorship, agency, and appropriation. College English, 75, 513–533.

Rhodes, Jacqueline. (2005). Radical feminism, Writing, and critical agency: From manifesto to modem. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Rich, Adreienne. (1995). Toward a woman-centered university. On lies, secrets, and silence: Selected prose. New York: Norton.

Roberts, Sarah T. (2016). Commercial content moderation: Digital laborers’ dirty work. In Safiya Umoja Noble & Brendesha M. Tynes (Eds.), The intersectional internet: Race, sex, class, and culture online (pp. 147–159). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Royster, Jacqueline Jones, & Kirsch, Gesa E. (2012). Feminist rhetorical practices: New horizons for rhetoric, composition, and literacy studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Selfe, Cynthia L. (1999). Technology and literacy: A story about the perils of not paying attention. College Composition and Communication, 50, 411–436.

Selfe, Cynthia L., & Selfe, Richard J. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45, 480–504.

Sparby, Erika. (2017). Digital social media and aggression: Memetic reaction in 4chan’s collective identity. Computers and Composition, 45, 85–97.

Srnicek, Nick. (2017). Platform capitalism. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Takayoshi, Pamela. (2000). Complicated women: Examining methodologies for understanding the uses of technology. Computers and Composition, 17, 123–138.

Terranova, Tiziana. (2004). Network culture: Politics for the information age. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.

Trice, Michael, & Potts, Liza. (2018). Building dark patterns into platforms: How GamerGate perturbed Twitter’s user experience. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, 3(6). Retrieved from

Twitter Safety. [Twitter Safety]. (2017, December 1). Earlier this week Tweets were sent that contained graphic and violent videos. We pointed people to our Help Center to explain why they remained up, and this caused some confusion. [Tweet]. Retrieved from

Twitter Safety. [Twitter Safety]. (2017, December 1). To clarify: these videos are not being kept up because they are newsworthy or for public interest. Rather, these videos are permitted on Twitter based on our current media policy. [Tweet]. Retrieved from

Twitter Safety. [Twitter Safety]. (2017, December 1). We will continue to re-evaluate and examine our policies as the world around us evolves. We appreciate the feedback and will continue to listen. [Tweet]. Retrieved from

van Dijck, José , & Poell, Thomas. (2016). Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), n.p.

Vie, Stephanie; Balzhiser, Deb; & Ralston, Devon Fitzgerald. (2014). Community guides: Disrupting oppression in comment threads on social sites. Technoculture: An Online Journal of Technology in Society, 4. Retrieved from

Wajcman, Judy. (2004). Technofeminism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

Wajcman, Judy. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 143–152.

Warzel, C. (2016, September 22). 90% of the people who took BuzzFeed News’ survey say Twitter didn't do anything when they reported abuse. Buzzfeed. Retrieved from

Wittenstein, J. (17 August, 2017). What is Trump worth to Twitter? One analyst estimates $2 billion. Bloomberg Technology. Retrieved from

Wysocki, Anne Frances, & Jasken, Julia I. (2004). What should be an unforgettable face…. Computers and Composition, 21, 29–48.