Works Cited

Abusief, M. E., Hornstein, M.D., & Jain, T. (2007). Assessment of United States fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines. Fertility and Sterility, 87(1), 88-92.

Almeling, R. (2006). Why do you want to be a donor?’: Gender and the production of altruism in egg and sperm donation. New Genetics and Society, 25(2): 143-157.

Assited Reproductive Technology. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved March 28th, 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_reproductive_technology

Bang, M. (2000). Picture this: How pictures work. San Francisco, CA: Sea Star Books.

Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

Butler, J. (2004). Bodily inscriptions, performative subversions. In S. Salih & J. Butler (Eds.), The Judith Butler reader (pp. 90-118). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Darnovsky, M. (2008, March 12). Female sperm and gay guinea pigs. The San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved from http://articles.sfgate.com/2008-03-12/opinion/17165857_1_sperm-same-sex-marriage-bone-marrow

Diepenbrock, C. (2000). God willed it! gynecology at the checkout stand: Reproductive technology in the women’s service magazine, 1977-1996. In M. Lay, L. J. Gurak, C. Gravon, & C. Myntti (Eds.), Body talk: Rhetoric, technology, reproduction (pp. 98-121). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Ericsson, P. F., & P. Muhlhauser. (2010). Techno-velcro to techno-memoria: Technology, rhetoric, and family in the composition classroom. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 15(2). Retrieved April 26, 2011, from  http://www.technorhetoric.net/15.2/topoi/ericsson-et-al/abstract.html

Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception. London, UK: Routledge.

Gere, A. R. (1994). Kitchen tables and rented rooms: The extracurriculum of composition. College Composition and Communication, 45(1), 75-92.

Goffman, E. (1987). Gender advertisements. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.

Google. (n.d.). Location. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/static.py?hl=en&page=guide.cs&guide=1224171&answer=179386&rd=1

Haas, A.M. (2009). Wired wombs: A rhetorical analysis of online infertility support communities. In K. Blair, R. Gajjala, & C. Tulley (Eds.), Webbing cyberfeminist practice: Communities, pedagogies, and social action (pp. 61-84). Creeskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Hill, C. A. (2004). The psychology of rhetorical images. In C. A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 25-40). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hobbs, P. (2007). Miracles of love: The use of metaphor in egg donor ads. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(1), 24-52.

Hope, D. S. (2004). Gendered environments: gender and the natural world in the rhetoric of advertising. In C. A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining Visual Rhetorics (pp. 155-177). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Huang, J. Y. J., Discepola, F., Al-Fozan, H., & Tolandi, T. (2005). Quality of fertility clinic websites. Fertility and Sterility, 83(3), 538-44.

Jansen, B. & Spink, A. (2006). How are we searching the world wide web?: A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing and Management, 42(1), 248-63.

Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London, UK: Routledge.

Lemke, J.L. (2004). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In C. Handa (Ed.), Visual rhetoric in a digital world: A critical sourcebook (pp. 71-93). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins.

McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

Mundy, L. (2007). Everything conceivable: How assisted reproduction is changing men, women, and the world. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Georges, E. & Mitchell, L. M. (2000). Baby talk: the rhetorical production of maternal and fetal selves. In M. Lay, L. J. Gurak, C.Gravon, & C. Myntti (Eds.), Body talk: Rhetoric, technology, reproduction (pp. 184-203). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Nielsen/NetRatings Announces U.S. August Search Share Rankings. (2008, September 22). Nielsen Online. Retrieved 2008, August 26 from http://www.nielsen-online.com/pr/pr_080922.pdf

Scott, L. (1994). Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. The Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 252-273.

Shanner, L. (2000). Bodies, minds, and failures: Images of women in infertility clinics. In M. Lay, L. J. Gurak, C. Gravon, & C. Myntti (Eds.), Body talk: Rhetoric, technology, reproduction (pp. 142-160). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Spar, D. L. (2006). The baby business: How money, science, and politics drive the commerce of conception. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wajcman, J. (1994). Delivered into men's hands? The social construction of reproductive technology. In G. Sen & R.C. Snow (Eds.), Power and decision: The social control of reproduction (pp. 153-175). Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yancey, K. B. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. College Composition and Communication, 56(2), 297-328.

Visual Images of Interface

Muhlhauser, P. & Muhlhauser, A. (Illustrators) (2010). Teaching Moms and Dads' Logo. [Digitized Drawings], United States of America.

Smart, R. (Photographer) (2009). Elementary School Lined Writing Paper [Digital Photograph], Retrieved 2011, April 28 from http://www.istockphoto.com/file_view_gateway/9661016-elementary-school-lined-writing-paper?id=9661016&ConcreteTypeID=3&Token=403681354&Collection=PayAsYouGo&downloadAction=RegularLicense, http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-9661016-elementary-school-lined-writing-paper.php

ART Company Websites Analyzed

Links and citations for ART company websites used in this study. All websites accessed between September and December 2008.

Sperm Donation Company Websites

California Cryobank, Incorporated. < http://www.cryobank.com/>.

Midwest Sperm Bank. < http://www.midwestspermbank.com/msb.htm>.

Cryogenic Laboratories Incorporated. < http://www.cryolab.com/Default.aspx>.

Fairfax Cryobank. < http://www.fairfaxcryobank.com/>.

Fertility Center of California. < http://www.spermbankcalifornia.com/>.

Sperm Bank of California. <http://www.thespermbankofca.org/>.

Sperm Donors Incorporated. < http://www.spermdonorsinc.com/>.

Xytex Corporation. <http://www.xytex.com>.

Egg Donation Company Websites

Egg Donation Incorporated. <http://www.eggdonor.com>.

Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine. <http://www.colocrm.com/>.

Family Creations. < http://www.familycreations.net>.

Heartfelt Egg Donation. < http://www.heartfelteggdonation.com/index.html>.

Pacific Fertility Center. < http://www.pacificfertilitycenter.com/>.

Tiny Treasures. < http://www.tinytreasuresagency.com/>.

Surrogacy Company Websites

Building Families. < http://www.buildingfamiliesinc.com/>.

The Gift of Surrogacy. < http://www.thegiftofsurrogacy.com/>.

Egg Donation and Surrogacy Company Websites

Center for Reproductive Health. <http://www.reproductivehealthctr.com/mainhome.htm>.

Conceptual Options. < http://www.surrogacy-eggdonation.com/>.

Family Source Consultants. < http://www.familysourcesurrogacy.com/>.

New Hope Surrogacy Center. < http://www.newhopesurrogacy.com/>.

Northeast Assisted Fertility Group. < http://www.assistedfertility.com/index.shtml>.

Reproductive Assistance Incorporated. < http://www.reproassistinc.com/>.

Surrogate Parenting Center of Texas. < http://www.spct.org/>.

The Egg Donor and Surrogacy Program. < http://www.eggdonation.com/>.

The Fertility Source. < http://www.fertilitysourcecompanies.com/>.

The Select Surrogate. < http://www.selectsurrogate.com/>.

Egg Donation and Sperm Donation Company Website

Northwest Andrology and Cryobank. < http://www.nwcryobank.com/>

Egg Donation, Sperm Donation, and Surrogacy Company Website

Growing Generations. < http://www.growinggenerations.com/>

Fair Use Statement

The inclusion of images and text from the websites listed above constitutes fair use. "Teaching Moms and Dads" is a critical piece meant for educational purposes. The piece does not extract a significant amount of content from the websites and will not directly profit the authors or the publishers of the sites or the journal where this piece is published.