Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning. Educase Review, 41(2), 32-44. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero
Arola, K. L. (2010). The design of Web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004
Atta, A. & Mahmoud, A. (2012). Web 2.0: A movement within the learning community. Information Management and Business Review, 4(12). 625-631. Available from http://www.ifrnd.org/JournalDetail.aspx?JournalID=1
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric. (pp. 79-101). London, England: Taylor & Francis.
Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth ♥ social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. (pp. 119-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/youth-identity-and-digital-media
Braender, L., Kapp, C., Yeras, J. (2009). Using web technology to teach students about their digital world. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2). 145-153. Retrieved from http://jise.org/index.html
Charlton, C. (2014) The weight of curious space: Rhetorical events, hackerspace, and emergent multimodal assessment. Computers and Composition, 31, 29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2013.12.002
Clark, E. J. (2010). The digital imperative: Making the case for a 21st-century pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 27, 27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.12.004
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.). Distributed cognition: Psychological and Educational Considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
D., Jenn (2012, Feb. 14). Which artists generated the most Twitter buzz at the 2012 Grammy Awards? (Blog). Retrieved from http://blog.tweetreach.com/2012/02/which-artists-generated-the-most-Twitter-buzz-at-the-2012-grammy-awards/
Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0 for schools. British Journal of Education Technology, 41(1), 141-142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01051_2.x
Dubisar, A., & Palmeri, J. (2010). Palin/Pathos/Peter Griffin: Political video remix and composition pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 27, 77-93. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.004
Engeström, Y. (1987) Learning by Expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/toc.htm
Evans, C. (2014). Twitter for teaching: Can social media be used to enhance the process of learning?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 902-915. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12099
Farhi, P. (2009). The Twitter explosion. American Journalism Review, 31(3), 26-31.
Garcia, A. (2013). Beautiful dark twisted pedagogy: Kanye West and the lessons of participatory culture. Radical Teacher, 97, 30-35. Retrieved from http://radicalteacher.library.pitt.edu
García-Galera, M. C., del Hoyo-Hurtado, M., & Fernándes-Múnoz, C. (2014). Engaged youth in the internet. The role of social networks in social active participation. Comunicar, 43(22), 35-43. doi: 10.3916/C43-2014-03
Gillen, J., & Merchant, G. Contact calls: Twitter as a dialogic social and linguistic practice. Language Sciences, 35, 47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.015
Hickey, D., McWilliams, J., & Honeyford, M. (2011). Reading Moby-Dick in a participatory culture: Organizing assessment for engagement in a new media era. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2) 247-263. doi: 10.2190/EC.45.2.g
Huberman, B., Romero, D., & Wu, Fang. (2008). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2317/2063
Ito, M., et al. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/MacArthur Foundation.
Jacquemin, S., Smelser, L., & Bernot, M. (2014). Twitter in the higher education classroom: A student and faculty assessment of use and perception. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(6), 22-27. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/college
Jacobs, G. (2012) The proverbial rock and hard place: The realities and risks of teaching in a world of multiliteracies, participatory culture, and mandates. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 56(2) 98-102. doi: 10.1002/JAAL.00109
Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A.J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: Macarthur Foundation.
Jenkins, H., & Kelley, W. (Eds.). (2013). Reading in a participatory culture: Reading Moby-Dick in a participatory classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Junco, R., Heibergert, G., & Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Kain, D., & Wardle, E. (2005) Building context: Using Activity theory to teach about genre in multi-major professional communication courses. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(2), 113-139. doi: 10.1207/s15427625tcq1402_1
Kain, D., & Wardle, E. (2006). Activity theory: an introduction for the writing classroom. Retrieved from http://core.ecu.edu/engl/kaind/3880/projects/AT.pdf
Lin, M.G., Hoffman, E.S., & Borengassar, C. (2013). Is social media too social for class?: A case study of Twitter use. TechTrends, 57(2), 39-45. doi: 10.1007/s11528-013-0644-2
Magnuson, M. (2013). Web 2.0 and information literacy instruction: Aligning technology with ACRL standards. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39, 244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.01.008
Maranto, G., & Barton, M. (2010). Paradox and promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 36-47. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.003
McShane, I. (2011) Public libraries, digital literacy, and participatory culture. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(3), 383-397. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2011.573254
Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 107-122. Retived from http://edlinked.soe.waikato.ac.nz/research/journal/index.php?id=1
Meuller, D. (2009). Digital underlife in the networked writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 26, 240-250. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.08.001
MIT TechTV (2008, August 12). What is Participatory Culture? [Video File]. Retrieved from http://video.mit.edu/watch/what-is-participatory-culture-3027/
Nielsen. (2012). State of the media: The social media report. New York, NY: NM Incite. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2012/state-of-the-media-the-social-media-report-2012.html
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Oreilly.com. Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
Pew Research Center. (2013a). 72% of online adults are social networking site users: Social networking sites remain most popular among young adults, but other age groups continue to increase their engagement. Washington, DC: Brenner, J. & Smith, A. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/
Pew Research Center. (2013b). Twitter news consumers: Young, mobile, and educated. Washington DC: Mitchell, A. and Guskin, E. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/
Prestridge, S. (2014). Active learning in higher education: A focus on students’ use of Twitter—Their interactions with each other, content and interface. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(2), 101-115. doi: 10.1177/1469787414527394
Purdy, J. P. (2010). The changing space of research: Web 2.0 and the integration of research and writing environments. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.12.001
Raynes-Goldie, K., Walker, L. (2008) Our space: Online civic engagement tools for youth. In L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic Life Online (pp. 161-188). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Reid, J. (2011). “We don’t Twitter, we Facebook”: An alternative pedagogical space that enables critical practices in relation to writing. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(1), 58-80. Retrieved from http://edlinked.soe.waikato.ac.nz/research/journal/index.php?id=1
Reilly, E., Mehta, R., Jenkins, H. (2013) Flows of Reading: Engaging With Texts. Retrieved from http://scalar.usc.edu/anvc/flowsofreading/index
Rheingold, H. (2008) Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement. In L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic Life Online (pp. 97-118). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rheingold, H. (2012). Stewards of digital literacy. Knowledge Quest, 41(1), 52-55. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/aasl/kq
Ritter, Kelly. Who Owns School?: Authority, Students and Online Discourse. New York: Hampton Press, 2010.
Rosales, J. (2013). Participatory culture at the Echo Park Film Center. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 5(1), 349-356. Available from http://www.jmle.org
Russell, D. (1995) Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In J. Petraglia (Ed.) Reconceiving Writing, Rethinking Writing Instruction (pp. 51-78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Russell, D. (1997) Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication. 14(4), 504-554
Selfe, C. (2009) The movement of air, the breath of meaning: Aurality and multimodal composing. College Composition and Communication, 60(4), 616-663. Available from http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc
Stedman, K. (2012). Remix literacy and fan composition. Computers and Composition, 29, 107-123. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2012.02.002
Twitter, Inc. Form S-1. For the period ending on October 15th, 2013. (filed Oct. 15th, 2013). Web: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000119312513400028/d564001ds1a.htm
Weprin, A. (2009, May 11). Much a-twitter about something: Tv execs are eyeing the hot microblogging service as a research tool and eventual money-maker. Broadcasting and Cable, (19), 12-3. Retrieved from http://www.broadcastingcable.com/news/programming/cover-story-much-twitter-about-something/34719
Wolff, W. (2013). Interactivity and the invisible: What counts as writing in the age of Web 2.0. Computers and Composition, 30, 211-225 doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2013.06.001
Yancey, K. (2009). Writing in the 21st century. National Council of Teachers of English. Urbana, IL: http://www.ncte.org/