Thinking Beyond Tools: Writing Program Administration
& Digital literacies
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • Theory
  • Respondents
  • Findings
    • Implementations
    • Motivations
    • Multiliteracies
  • Implications
  • References

REFERENCES

floppy disks
TEXTS

​
Adsanatham, C., Alexander, P., Carsey, K., Dubisar, A., Fedeczko, W., Landrum-Geyer, D., . . . Polak, M. (2013). Going multimodal: Programmatic, curricular, and classroom change. In T. Bowen & C. Whithaus (Eds.), Multimodal literacies and emerging genres (282-312). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Ballentine, B. (2009). Hacker ethical and Firefox extensions: Writing and teaching the ‘grey’ areas of web 2.0. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://cconlinejournal.org/Ballentine/

Coley, T. (2012). Teaching with digital media in writing studies: An exploration of ethical responsibilities. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Day, M. (2009). The administrator as technorhetorician: Sustainable technological ecologies in academic programs. In D. DeVoss, H. McKee, & R. Selfe (Eds.), Technological ecologies and sustainability: Methods, modes, and assessment (pp. 1-19). Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press.

DeVoss, D., Eidman-Aadahl, E., & Hicks, T. (2010). Because digital writing matters. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Dobrin, S. (2011). Ecology and concepts of technology. Writing Program Administration, 35, 175-198. 

Duffelmeyer, B. (2000). Critical computer literacy: Computers in first-year composition as topic and environment. Computers and Composition, 17, 289-307.

Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
 
—. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Hawisher, G. & Selfe, C. (2004). Literate lives in the information age: Narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Johnson-Eilola, J. (1997). Wild technologies: Computer use and social responsibility. In S. Selber (Ed.), Computers and technical communication: Pedagogical and programmatic perspectives. (pp. 97–128). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

Kimme Hea, A. C. (2002). Rearticulating e-dentities in the web-based classroom: One technoresearcher’s exploration of power and the World Wide Web. Computers and Composition, 19(3), 331–346.

—. & Turnley, M. (2010). A tale of two tech chicks: Negotiating gendered assumptions about program administration and technology. In K. Ratcliffe & R. Rickley (Eds.), Performing Feminism and Administration in Rhetoric and Composition Studies. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Kress, G. (1999). English at the crossroads: Rethinking curricula of communication in the context of the turn to the visual. In G. Hawisher & C. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 66-88). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Laflen, A. (2014). Composing the self online: Prezi literacy narratives. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://www.cconlinejournal.org/LaflenWebText/

Leverenz, C. (2008). Remediating writing program administration. WPA: Writing Program Administration 32, 37-56.

McLeod, S. (2007). Writing program administration. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

McAllister, K., & Selfe, C. (2002). Writing program administration and instructional computing. In S. Brown & T. Enos, The writing program administrator’s resource (pp. 341-375). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
​
​Murray, J. (2009). Non-discursive rhetoric: Image and affect in multimodal composition. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Palmquist, M. (2005). Information technology as other: Reflections on a useful problem. In S. J. McGee and C. Handa (Eds.), Discord and Direction: The postmodern writing program administrator (pp. 95-104). Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press.

Remley, D. (2012). Forming assessment of machinima video. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://www.cconlinejournal.org/cconline_Sp_2012/SLassesswebtext/index.html

Selber, S. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
 
—. (2010). Rhetorics and technologies: New directions in writing and communication. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

Selfe, C. (Ed.). (2007). Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

—. (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century: The importance of paying attention. Carbondale: Southern Illinois.

Stewart M. (2014). The social practice of digital literacy in the internet age: Multimodal composition, information, and collaboration. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://www.cconlinejournal.org/fall14/social/index.html

Takayoshi, P., & Huot, B. (2009). Composing in a digital world: The transition of a writing program and its faculty. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 32, 89-119.

Taylor, T. (2002). Ten commandments for computers and composition. In I. Ward & W. Carpenter (Eds.), The Allyn & Bacon sourcebook for writing program administrators. New York, NY: Longman.

Turnley, M. (2011). Towards a mediological method: A framework for critically engaging dimensions of a medium. Computers and Composition, 28, 126-144.


Umbach, P. (2005). Getting back to the basics of survey research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 127, 91-100.

Yancey, K. B. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. College Composition and Communication, 56, 297-328.


IMAGES

All images are either photos taken by myself or Creative Commons licensed images that do not require attribution (Creative Commons Zero license.)

MULTIMEDIA

I used Infogram, with a paid license, to create the interactive charts. I designed the other charts in Infogram, Word, and/or Canva. Gifs were pulled from Giphy and are linked accordingly.

Home
While I suggest reading this webtext from left to right following the navigation buttons, the sections of the "findings" category can be read in any order, based on your interests, and the "implications" section can be explored at the beginning or end of your reading experience. I also suggest navigating back to the "theory" section to compare the theoretical framework to the survey findings/implications. You might also find it useful to read my approach to data analysis in conjunction with the findings.
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • Theory
  • Respondents
  • Findings
    • Implementations
    • Motivations
    • Multiliteracies
  • Implications
  • References