Keeping Track of DMAC



Visualizing Influence Across Space and Time


Trey Conatser

analysis ii





The Analysis II section visualizes data from a 2014 survey sent to all DMAC alumni. For a full account of the survey questions, see the Method section of this article. Navigate this section with the numbered buttons above, and mouse over the visuals for more information.



Participants from every DMAC Institute submitted responses to the survey, with an approximately 50% greater response rate from more recent Institutes (2012-2014). Outdated email addresses (the means of survey distribution), changing career priorities, and the freshness of memory may partially explain the drop in responses from DMAC alumni prior to the 2012 Institute. Most responses come from what I'd call the middle rung of academic labor: graduate students and tenured or tenure-track faculty (38% and 45% of respondents, respectively). For those who reported a seniority or tenure status, there was an even split between tenure-track or junior faculty and tenured or senior faculty. Non-tenure-track faculty account for only 14% of survey responses and administrative positions account for only 9%.


For the charts below, the integer represents the percent of total respondents. Because an individual respondent could identify with more than one role (a faculty member can also work in an administrative role, for example), the number of identifications with each role is considered in relation to the total number of respondents instead of the total number of roles.


Click here to download a static image of this chart



Click here to download a static image of this chart



Click here to download a static image of this chart



Click here to download a static image of this chart